My Current Writing Project

The Pulp Revolution loves itself some pulpy fantasy and science fiction.  It’s currently undergoing a long and protracted conversation about where exactly the genre took a left turn for the worse.  There are a lot of theories and finger pointing, with some rather elegant defenses of particular styles.  Loud mouth zealots make grand, sweeping gestures, then retract a bit when others point out exceptions.  Writers and editors of yesteryear get smeared and then have their reputations rehabilitated.  For example, Karl Gallagher’s erudite analysis of Campbellian sci-fi softened my stance on Campbell.

With the exception of the New Wave authors.  Aside from a few gems in the cesspool, nobody likes those guys.

Of course, as readers and open minded sorts, the Pulp Revolution looks outward and analyzes information from other sources.  Whether it’s showing respect to somebody like Rick Stump for his excellent analysis of why Hollywood can’t get Conan right, or mocking the mockable mockeries of analysis like this prize pig, everything is fair game and nothing is off limits.

A number of commenters have pointed fingers at Damon Knight, the man who founded the SFWA and who is most famous for writing a story that ends with a man shouting that “To Serve Man” is a cookbook.  I hesitate to name names, because I’ll forget to mention one or get those mentioned in trouble, but “Cirsova” Alexander and Nathan Housely are the primary culprits here.

Intrigued, I started doing some legwork, and everything fits together nicely nicely, thank you very much.  Damon Knight was a mid-tier author who bullied his way to the top through hubris and vindictiveness.  He did everything he could to assume command of the genre from writing amateur and biased reviews (Really, Damon?  Blish is a great writer and Robert E. Howard a hack?  Yagottabekiddingme,) to starting workshops to teach gullible writers “How it’s really done”, to founding the SFWA and conveniently serving as its first president, the better to determine who really counts as a ‘the right kind of author’.  Of all of the gatekeepers who have made science fiction worse over the years, he was the original and so far as I can tell, the worst of the lot.

I started compiling notes and putting the pieces together, and have been forced to change directions a few times during this process.  While my overall thesis has not changed, certain pieces needed to be shuffled around, and looked at in new contexts.  As new information comes in, and as the conversations continue, I expect other changes to occur as well.  I will probably even post a few chapters here for open criticism and stress testing before declaring it ready for prime-time.

Right now the analysis clocks in at about 8,000 words, and it looks like I’m about half-way done.  So expect a quick read sometime in April/May.  Right now, I’m not sure where it will wind up.  Stay tuned, I’ll keep you posted.

About Jon Mollison

Jon Mollison was weaned at the literary knee of Tolkein, Howard, Moore, and Burroughs. He spent decades wandering in the wilderness of modern genre fiction, wondering when the magic and wonder went out of the world of dragons and space ships. In his darkest hour, he encountered a wise man who handed him the open secrets to crafting works that emulate the stories of the great authors who built the genre. They are easily summarized in but two words: Regress Harder. Now one of the twelve champions of the Pulp Revolution, his self-published works represent a more direct lineage to the tales of action, mystery, romance, virtue, and pure unalloyed adventure than the bland imitations churned out by New York City publishing houses in recent decades.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to My Current Writing Project

  1. I like New Wave. So there.

  2. Jeffro says:

    Criticism is powerful. That's how the field was first subverted and then destroyed. Not everyone will appreciate the pushback. But nothing will call off the dogs at this point. There's too much work to be done and too big of a story to break.

  3. John Boyle says:

    I'm looking forward to seeing this when you finish it. Should jack up my blood pressure nicely.

    John E. Boyle
    Loud Mouthed Zealot since 1961

  4. Jon Mollison says:

    Knight didn't have any ideas. His was a cult of personality. Exposing him for the fraud that he was serves an important role in freeing up additional real estate *for ideas* in the genre. Those who care about ideas rather than personalities should be the first ones to celebrate knocking guys like Knight down a peg.

    Thanks to Amazon, the gatekeepers that held the free expression of ideas are up against the ropes right now. My aim is to help send one of them to the mat.

  5. The interesting thing to me is how much folks on the pulp side of the argument are making it about specific people while Campbellians (a term I hate, actually) are interested in the ideas more than who expressed them.

  6. cirsova says:

    To be fair, others have commented far more and far more knowledgeably on Knight than I have. My own look into him has been pretty shallow, merely noting that he was popular troll in the PS letters section.

Comments are closed.